Analysts
at the Financial Derivatives Company Limited (FDC) have argued that
the perennial volatility recorded by the naira in the parallel market
will continue unless the supply-demand dynamics are adjusted and the
domestic manufacturing industry becomes competitive on the
international front. The Lagos-based financial advisory and research
firm noted that import dependency had crippled the manufacturing
sector, describing it as a weed that needs to be uprooted.
However,
the firm in its latest monthly economic report, pointed out issues
such as the fuel subsidy needs to be resolved before visiting the
core of the monster causing the volatility at the Nigerian foreign
exchange.
The
FDC maintained that the removal of the fuel subsidy would reduce the
country’s import bill by 21 per cent, which includes the
importation of refined crude products, as importers will have to bear
the cost of oil price volatility and exchange rate depreciation.
“This
will make the importation of premium motor spirit a less profitable
venture. Moreover, local refineries have resumed operations, expected
to run at 150,000bpd, further reducing the business prospects of
local importers. Hence, the indirect effect of a subsidy removal is a
reduction in the outflow of foreign exchange.
“This
will reduce pressure currently being exerted on the foreign reserves,
thereby creating room for the Nigerian government to meet obligations
at the foreign exchange market,” it explained.
The
report stated that another sector to be reviewed in terms of foreign
exchange out-flows is the invisible sector.
According
to the Central Bank Economic Report, the invisible sector accounted
for the bulk (41.5 per cent) of total foreign exchange disbursed in
April 2015, higher than the 36.9 per cent disbursed in January 2015.
According
to the Global Financial Integrity, Nigeria ranked 7th among the top
10 countries with the largest illicit financial outflows.
To
this end, the FDC argued that if fuel subsidy was addressed and other
leakages are blocked, this will reduce the bogus demand in the import
bill.
“Secondly,
Nigeria needs to adopt a free-floating exchange rate regime. The CBN
started this process by moving from an auction system in February.
The problem is that because the price (exchange rate) is not in
equilibrium, there remains a significant demand overhang. The
unsatisfied demand is filtering into the parallel market. The
distortion created by this gap is a major source of concern to policy
makers and investors.
“There
have also been frequent interventions to support the currency when
necessary. Under a free floating exchange regime, the true value of
the naira will be determined by the forces of demand and supply at
the foreign exchange market. While a free float would be extremely
harmful to the consumers and importers, devaluation is no less so.
The main difference is that there is no certainty at-attached to the
magnitude of depreciation. However, in the long run, it will
encourage international and domestic investments and help stabilise
the naira.
“It
is important to note that the sharp decline in oil prices in June
2014 is considered to be the immediate cause of the sudden pressure
on the exchange rate. This is because the oil and gas sector remains
the major contributor to foreign earnings increasing the
vulnerability of the naira to external imbalances.
“However,
other remote causes remain as Nigeria would have been less vulnerable
to this shock if strategic policies had been implemented to eliminate
fundamental weaknesses within the system. Historically, the Nigerian
economy had experienced cyclical downturns that are tied to global
oil price,” it added.
No comments:
Post a Comment