Toby Lankford, who describes himself “a developer/tinkerer that
loves aerial and personal robotics, living off grid, and growing good food
naturally with robots” has a project that should
be of interest to Africa’s endangered rhinos and elephants.
He is working on a 3D
printed drone that he hopes can be used as a bush plane to assist in
stopping the poaching of Africa’s wildlife.
With drones, it’s
like we’re living in the Wild West of 3D printing, if this and other
news over the past week is anything to go by. In Britain, a 3D printed drone was
launched from a British military warship over the weekend and
successfully flew to shore, a demonstration that could pave the way for
futuristic spy drones that could be printed at sea.
The drone, largely made of
nylon, is cheap and quick to make; the print run takes 48 hours in total,
including time for cooling. It potentially heralds a new way of waging war;armies in the battlefield could print their own custom-made weapons,
vehicles and replacement parts as needed, reducing the need for imports or
relying on factories back at home.
In the US, the Food and Drug
Administration just approved the first 3D printed drug, a
medication for epilepsy that allows it to dissolve more quickly, which means
that a high drug load, up to 1,000mg can be delivered in a single dose. More
importantly, it opens the door for medication to be more effective by being
tailored for individual patients.
It’s already happening with
prosthetic limbs. In
Uganda, 3D printing is being used to create custom-made prosthetic
limbs for amputees. In the past, the all-important plaster cast sockets that
connect artificial limbs to a person’s hip took about a week to make, and were often
so uncomfortable people ended up not wearing them.
Plastic printed ones can be
made in a day and are a closer, more comfortable fit. It also makes huge
savings, with the cost expected to come down from $5,000 to $250 per prosthetic
fit – 95% cheaper.
Ugandan schoolboy sits next to his 3D printed
artificial limb at the Comprehensive
Rehabilitation Services in Wakiso, Uganda.
|
There’s all kinds of nifty,
astonishing, and crazy 3D printed products under design right now; the
recent explosion in the technology is thanks to an clutch of 3D printing
patents that expired in early 2014 and made it available for the broad market.
NASA is working on a 3D
printed “tree”, which, instead of a whole tree, is a cellular array
that mimics plant cells and secretes organic materials such as wood, rubber or
cellulose.
The team believes they can pull
of a proof-of-concept deadline by October, and are hoping to create unique
materials like carbon-reinforced wood, or wood infused with copper nano-wires,
which means that perhaps one day there will be no need for unsightly
electricity posts and wires everywhere to transmit power; trees themselves
could just act as transmission lines.
Early this year, Hans Fouche of
South Africa printed a
lawn mower in just nine hours, and followed it up with a vacuum cleaner that
doubles up as a flowerpot. Fouche’s inventions came just months after
Togolese inventor Afate Gnikou actually assembled a 3D printer from electronic
waste collected from dumpsites around the capital Lomé.
3D printing works by
translating digital information into physical objects; computer software
directs molten metal, plastic or other material to build an object layer by
layer.
The technology turns traditional
manufacturing upside down; instead of massive factories running on expensive
equipment, it makes possible light, decentralised, “guerilla” manufacturing.
In 2010 sub-Saharan Africa’s
average share of manufacturing value added in GDP was 10%, unchanged from the
1970s, while the region’s share of world manufactured exports has fallen from
0.3% in 1980 to 0.2% in 2010.
Advanced manufacturing is part
of a bigger trend that is re-shaping the industrial sector into a very
different structure from the dank sweatshops that have typically characterised
manufacturing.
The coming together of digital
technologies and industrial activity is happening along different lines,
including automation and robotics, data-driven supply chains and work flows,
crowdsourcing in industrial innovation, and digitally driven manufacturing
techniques, of which 3D printing is a part of.
Marco Annunziata, chief
economist of General Electric, recently described
three aspects of the
“new industrial age” – first, there is the Industrial Internet, which merges
“big data with big iron”, integrating cloud-based analytics with industrial
machinery, resulting in greater efficiency and reduced downtime.
For example, a
digitally-integrated wind farm could allow turbines to communicate with each
other, and respond in a coordinated way to changes in environmental conditions:
as the force and direction of the wind changes, the turbines can modify the
pitch of their blades in a coordinated manner to maximise power output for the
entire wind farm, as opposed to every wind turbine optimising its own output in
isolation.
Second, there’s Advanced
Manufacturing, which links design, product engineering, manufacturing, supply
chain, distribution, and servicing into one cohesive and intelligent system.
And finally, there’s the “Global Brain”, as Annunziata calls it
- the collective intelligence of human beings across the globe, integrated by
digital communication networks. Essentially, instead of spending painstaking
hours developing a product yourself, you could simply ask other people to
design it for you.
It short-circuits the need for
highly skilled internal capacity, which could be exactly what the continent
needs – Africa is suffering from a skills shortage, particularly the technical
jobs such as prototyping and industrial design.
Less than 10% of Africans of
university-age are enrolled in higher education; Unesco
estimates that in
countries like Namibia, Zimbabwe and Tanzania, there is one qualified engineer
for a population of 6,000 people, compared to one engineer per 200 people in
China.
Tapping into the global pool of
knowledge could help African countries to make up for skills shortages and
just focus on the manufacturing process itself.
But like green energy, the
pitfall could be in the politics.
There’s always been power in government shaping of industrial policy in a
country, and in the African context, it has often encouraged rent-seeking and
political favouritism, as opposed to sound business decisions.
Most African countries followed
a similar industrial policy from independence – there was the import
substitution phase in the 60s and 70s, where governments sought to reduce
dependence on international imports by deliberately supporting domestic industries
to produce goods for local consumption.
In countries like Guinea and
Tanzania, it meant nationalising industries and bringing them under direct
government control; and in freer countries like Kenya, it meant protecting
local industries from foreign competition through import tariffs, exchange
controls, price controls and other protectionist measures.
But in the end, these controls
created a business environment that reduced the need to innovate and made the
industries uncompetitive. Most countries dismantled these protections in the
1980s and 90s, liberalised their economies and abandoned the import
substitution model. In Tanzania, for example, by the year 1990, 22 out of the
country’s 24 textile factories had
closed.
Many countries are now courting
foreign direct investment, offering incentives like tax holidays and export
processing zones - with varying success. Ethiopia’s state-led industrial
model is one of the relatively
successful ones,
industry value added share to GDP has been about 14% in the past decade.
Still, there’s now a chance for
young African entrepreneurs to side-step that whole political minefield, and
with a modest capital investment, create quality, innovative products that can
compete on the global stage.
No comments:
Post a Comment