The government of Cameroon has launched a campaign against social media,
which according to the government-controlled daily, Cameroon Tribune,
is “fast becoming a threat to peace and a secret instrument of manipulation”
promoting “character destruction, destabilisation of public opinion and
deformation of facts among others.”
According to the bilingual daily, which published a special edition
headlined “Dérives sur les réseaux sociaux : la cote d’alerte”
(“The downward spiral on social media has reached alarming levels”):
A careful analysis of the situation tells of a phenomenon that is
proving to be dangerous for society if no measures are taken to scale it down.
This is important especially as elections are approaching. People with
political ambitions may dive into it and use it to fight their opponents.
Other government media outlets, particularly the state-controlled
Cameroon Radio Television (CRTV), have also joined the campaign to highlight
the alleged ills of social media and the need for social media regulation in
Cameroon. This was the case, for example, of the French (audio) and English (audio)
language radio newscasts of November 1.
Once government officials finally conceded that there had been a train
accident, social media played a vital role in providing an alternative
narrative to official accounts about the derailment, for example, making the
case that overcrowding and defective Chinese-made carriages were likely
contributing factors, not just speed as Bolloré officials claimed.
Many Cameroonians criticised
President Paul Biya on social media for what they perceived as his lukewarm
attitude towards the tragedy – not only did the president send a message of
condolence to the victims from Switzerland (incidentally via social media ), he
did not return home immediately after the accident.
Stung by the accusations of negligence, incompetence and presidential
indifference, the government played the victim :
Some individuals quickly transformed the Eseka disaster into a
convenient alibi, an ideal outlet to strike, to deal the death blow and satisfy
their despicable political appetites… [Their] statements obviously had a single
objective: overwhelm and embarrass the President of the Republic to the
maximum, and benefit from the political fallout.
During a press conference days after the accident, the Minister of
Communication and Government Spokesperson, Issa Tchiroma, responded :
Internet users are constantly angry… it is their character… we are not
bothered by social media. In any case, it is a space that we have to logically
occupy.
The Media as a “new form of terrorism”
The anti-social media campaign was taken a notch higher on November 10
when, in a speech to parliament, the Speaker of the National Assembly, Cavaye
Djibril, complained about “the social malaise” caused by the “insidious effects
of the social media” in Cameroon, which he described as “a new form of
terrorism”:
Social media… is now being used for misinformation, and even
intoxication and manipulation of consciences thereby instilling fear in the
general public. In fact, it has become as dangerous as a missile… In a
nutshell, social media has become a real social pandemic in Cameroon… I urge
the appropriate authorities to see the pressing need to track down and
neutralize the culprits of cybercrimes… we should know that there is a limit to
freedom, for freedom without limit stifles freedom.
The speaker’s statement seemed to confirm persistent claims that the
government is drafting a social media bill to stifle speech on social media.
Social media legislation in Cameroon
Although Cameroon does laws that address social media, a 2010 law
relating to cyber security and cyber-criminality contains two key sections that
sanction online activity.
According to Section 77:
(1) Whoever uses electronic communication or an information system
to act in contempt of race or religion shall be punished with imprisonment for from
02 (two) years to 05 (five) years or a fine of from 2 000 000 (two million) to
5,000,000 (five million) CFA francs or both of such fine and imprisonment.
(2) The penalties provided for in Subsection 1 above shall be
doubled where the offence is committed with the aim of stirring up hatred and
contempt between citizens.
According to Section 78:
(1) Whoever uses electronic communications or an information system
to design, to publish or propagate a piece of information without being able to
attest its veracity or prove that the said piece of information was true shall
be punished with imprisonment for from 06 (six) months to 02 (two) years or a
fine of from 5,000,000 (five million) to 10,000,000 (ten million) CFA francs or
both of such fine and imprisonment.
(2) The penalties provided for in Subsection 1 above shall be
doubled where the offence is committed with the aim of disturbing public peace.
According to Internet World Stats (IWS), a website that tracks regional
and global Internet usage, there were about 4.3 million Internet users in
Cameroon as of June 2016, with an Internet penetration rate of 17.7% (up from
6.4% in 2013).
According to a recent survey by Mediametrie, a French audience
measurement company, Facebook is the most popular social media platform in the
country (IWS puts the number of Facebook users at 2,100,000) followed by
Google+, Instagram, Twitter and LinkedIn. The survey reveals that 73.3% of
individuals between the ages of 15 and 24 have social media accounts.
Social media is increasingly becoming a rallying point for those who
want a change at the helm of the state. No surprise, therefore, that the Biya
regime views social media as a subversive space that must not be left unchecked
The State of Cameroon is resolutely committed to the fight against
social media so as to preserve the image of the country.
It appears that for the Biya regime, social media users must either be
co-opted or coerced into submission if they wish to continue expressing themselves
online.
No comments:
Post a Comment